Do you like reading? Or maybe do you have enough free time to get your favorite books? Well, you do not have answer the questions above too seriously. It is because we have the best solution for you!
|Country:||Antigua & Barbuda|
|Published (Last):||26 November 2015|
|PDF File Size:||6.3 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.78 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The need for freedom in the software industry has always been strong. Thanks to the legal deep involvement many people have shown, this kind of software has now become a possible choice. The first users of UNIX have been universities, which - without any kind of support or warranty - low cost version of this operating system were given. It is right after the lack of support from the main company who produced it that cooperation among the different users between universities started to rise.
Hype around UNIX started to focus in the Berkeley University of California, where, starting from people started to distribute a different version for this operating system: BSD Berkeley software distribution.
To protect software developed this way, the BSD license was born. This license was the first brick on which the free software philosophy was born. This stayed this way until someone wanted to clean Unix BSD from the proprietary source code. First release for the software was BSD that saw the light of day during year with version 0. This free edition of Unix BSD was not lucky, because starting from then on, judicial fights for the property of part of the code stated as free started to rise whatever it did belong to.
Starting from the problems of BSD that forced the public distribution to be eliminated, many other proprietary projects focused on building a free BSD system started to spring. Anyway, legal problems were not solved; concerning FreeBSD in particular, this type of BSD was "free" only at the beginning of with version 2. Hubbard, march This was based on the 4. It was a fairly reasonable success for a first offering, and we followed it with the highly successful FreeBSD 1.
Around this time, some rather unexpected storm clouds formed on the horizon as Novell and U. A condition of that settlement was U. What Berkeley got in return was Novell's "blessing" that the 4. Under the terms of that agreement, the project was allowed one last release before the deadline, that release being FreeBSD 1.
FreeBSD then set about the arduous task of literally re-inventing itself from a completely new and rather incomplete set of 4. The "Lite" releases were light in part because Berkeley's CSRG had removed large chunks of code required for actually constructing a bootable running system due to various legal requirements and the fact that the Intel port of 4.
Despite being still more than a little rough around the edges, the release was a significant success and was followed by the more robust and easier to install FreeBSD 2.
As an example, the strong point of OpenBSD is in its founding in Canada, from where components for cryptographic communications can be exported. In , Richard Stallman founded FSF Free software foundation with the aim in mind to create and spread worldwide the "free software" philosophy. With freedom is meant the chance of distributing and modifying software adapting it to your own needs and to distribute even the changes made to the original code freely chapter Later on, these philosophical ideas turned into the development of a license focusing on the use of the software, the General Public License section A , this license was especially developed to protect free software and to prevent stealing of ownership that could have stopped its free distribution.
Basing on this, copyrighted software protected this way is now referred to as copyleft. Of course free software needs something to ground himself: one of the main aims that Richard Stallman was thinking of was developing a complete operating system with the help of volunteers. First step was the development of a C compiler which was used to build some basic system programs needed for the main preparation of the operating system core.
The GNU project gave life to a large number of software releases that could be used on almost every Unix platform available, pushing in the end free software to that kind of systems. At the end of s, professor Andrew S. Tanenbaum chapter started to develop a Unix operating system for i86 computer, exclusively made for teaching purposes.
Buying the related book was enough to get hold of a complete system together with sources. This brought to a problem where Minix could not be freely modified and distributed if not for purely teaching purposes. Rights for this operating system were given to the press company in charge for the pressing when the book was released.
In year Andrew S. Tanenbaum agreed with the press company to make the Minix license less restrictive, making it more similar to the BSD one. Linux was born as a personal project by Linus Torvalds student of the Helsinki university in Finland leaned towards the study and development of software on i microprocessors. He later decided to move studying of i microprocessors on Minix, with the idea of realizing something like it in mind.
He was thinking to start from that operating system to make a better Minix than Minix and later drop it completely. After a lot of work Linus Torvalds was finally able to develop a minimal system that was totally autonomous from Minix. The 5th of October he posted the following message on comp. Do you pine for the nice days of Minix Are you without a nice project and just dying to cut your teeth on a OS you can try to modify for your needs?
Are you finding it frustrating when everything works on Minix? No more all-nighters to get a nifty program working? Then this post might be just for you. It has finally reached the stage where it's even usable though may not be depending on what you want , and I am willing to put out the sources for wider distribution. It is just version 0. Birthday of the operating system based on the Linux 2 kernel is so ; as trying to establish the exact birth of version 0.
At that time it wasn't yet an operating system, but it helped to show the right path had been taken. Linux has not been a single man project for long, in a very short time it involved many people, all tied together from the hype of participating in a project free of legal restriction, limitations of use and modification possibility. In the end, comparing to Minix, Linux's luck has been the adoption of the GNU-GPL license section A since the beginning, that is still today the right choice for protecting software developed and available for everybody.
This way Minix's limit of being attractive for professors and students only was surpassed. The GPL license makes Linux attractive for everyone. Once the importance of free software had been understood and economical interests or similar intentions started to spring, the need for a clean and neat definition of what "free software" exactly is began to arise. To avoid feeding confusion with the words "free software", in the definition Open Source was born to relate to software that has met the requirements to be "free software".
At least this was the intention behind it. Even though the intention was good, the resulting name is even more ambiguous because it doesn't point one of the concept it should summarise.
Open Source does not strictly relate to "freedom", which is the basement of free software. Open Source is a registered trademark, but this does not limit people from using these words to simply describe proprietary software which distributes source code in some way and "fool" people by calling it free software; while it has absolutely nothing to do with it. Biggest problem is always ignorance: the concept behind free software is not spread and understood like its own name.
Even if on its own all this fuss is not bad, this situation makes things even more difficult for the common people identifying free software as well as the meaning and value of it. If you look at the people who started all this and strongly believes in the philosophy behind it, you will surely see no happiness. This does not imply fight against proprietary software but instead identify them both, especially to avoid breaking the law.
Last thing to consider on free software is the patent applied on all the algorithms and other concepts tied to software. Patents prevent developing of free software that uses patented algorithms even if protected code is not used. The Debian definition for what is "free" mostly follows what Open Source means. This is fairly less restrictive from what the Free Software Foundation says.
Apart from this difference, Debian work to classify software is very important to the average distracted user. You can check what you have installed in your system with vrms , a command that literally means Virtual RMS , a "virtual" Richard Stallman.
As an example here is posted a sample report of the program:. As you can see in this sample report also documentation is covered, not only software intended as application software. Chapter Brief history of free software 1 The need for freedom in the software industry has always been strong.
Index of /pool/universe/a/appunti-informatica-libera
ISBN 13: 9788875470043
- BRIFFAULT THE MOTHERS PDF
- DZOZEF KEMBEL PDF
- DEAR NOBODY BERLIE DOHERTY PDF
- KOMPOZER DOCUMENTATION PDF
- AN INTRODUCTION TO SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS STULLER PDF
- ADVANCED PHYSICAL GEODESY MORITZ PDF
- COMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOW BY YAHYA PDF
- EM BUSCA DE UM FINAL FELIZ KATHERINE BOO PDF
- ANTANAS BARANAUSKAS ANYKSCIU SILELIS PDF